Title I
Title I Parent/Guardian Advisory Committee Meeting: August 17 at 7:15 pm.
All parents/guardians are welcome to attend to review and provide feedback on our school’s Parent/Guardian Family Engagement Policy, Title I Compact,
and Title I School Improvement Plan.
Title I, Part A:
What is Title I?
Title I is a federal education program under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965, which was renamed as No Child Left Behind (NCLB) in 2001. Title I, Part A provides Utah with Federal funds each year to help higher poverty schools provide supplemental educational services to meet the needs of disadvantaged students.
Goals of Title I Part
- Helping students achieve proficiency and growth on rigorous State academic standard in Reading/Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science
- Providing a well-rounded education for all students
- Engaging parents in helping their children succeed through meaningful, high-quality, evidence-based parent, family, and community engagement activities
- Building teacher capacity through high-quality, on-going, job-embedded professional learning opportunities
- Closing achievement gaps
Parents Right to Know (ESEA Section 1112)
As a parent of a student at a Title I school in the Tooele School District, you have the right to know the professional qualifications of the classroom teachers who instruct your child, the services being provided by paraprofessionals, and academic achievement and progress information. Federal law requires the school district to provide you with this information in a timely manner if you request it. Specifically, you have the right to request the following information:
- Whether the student’s teacher—
- has met State qualification and licensing criteria for the grade levels and subject areas in which the teacher provides instruction;
- is teaching under emergency or other provisional status through which State qualification or licensing criteria have been waived; and
- is teaching in the field of discipline of the certification of the teacher.
- Whether the child is provided with services by paraprofessionals and, if so, his or her qualifications.
- Information on the level of achievement and academic growth of the student, if applicable and available, on each of the State academic assessments.
- Timely notice that the student has been assigned, or has been taught for 4 or more consecutive weeks by, a teacher who does not meet applicable State certification or licensure requirements at the grade level and subject area in which the teacher has been assigned.
- Parent/Guardian and Family Engagement Policy
- School-Family Compact
- School Improvement Plan
- School Report Card
Parent/Guardian and Family Engagement Policy
All schools that receive Title I funds are bound by section 1116 of Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) to develop a written Parent and Family Engagement Policy. This policy, developed in conjunction with Parents describe how the school will conduct meaningful parent and family involvement.
GENERAL
Parents and family members are involved in the school's Parent and Family Development Commitment policy. At Copper Canyon Elementary, we engage our stakeholders by reviewing data, establishing school goals, and discussing school-wide needs during the School Community Council (PTA) meeting, Construction Leadership Team meeting, and meetings.
POLICY PARTICIPATION
Annual meeting: An annual meeting is held each year in the fall. At this meeting, the information is shared with stakeholders, consisting of an explanation of Title I, how funds are allocated, literacy and math performance, intervention and enrichment opportunities for students, and ways that stakeholders communicate with the school.
Flexible Meetings: We offer flexible meeting times for parents and families to participate in decisions with respect to their children.
Engaging parents: We collect data from an annual survey and meetings with SCC and PTA. Once the data is collected, we review the data and assess the needs. We use this information to create a plan with our SCC on how to engage parents.
SHARED RESPONSIBILITY - HIGH ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF STUDENTS
The Copper Canyon Family Parent Covenant outlines shared responsibilities for academically high-achieving students and is developed jointly with parents, teachers, administrators, and students.
CAPACITY BUILDING FOR PARTICIPATION
Improve academic achievement and ensure effective parental involvement to support a Partnership with the school, Copper Canyon Elementary School:
1. Share with stakeholders the Utah Core Standards, state and local assessment information, and forms. Parents can monitor the academic success of their students. At CCES, we will share this information at least 4 times a year through standards reports, parent-teacher conferences, and community activities.
2. Provide materials and/or training for parents to work with their children to improve the quality of their children. Achievements in core subject areas such as literacy, mathematics, and technology. In the Copper Canyon Primary, we do this by providing community and school activities.
3. Provide professional development for administrators, teachers, and educational support staff about the value of parents as equal partners and the creation of bonds between parents and the school. Copper Canyon Elementary School does this by providing information about parent involvement during committee meetings, such as PTA, SCC, and through emails. We reviewed the survey data. We partner by having an ongoing SCC agenda item in ways that we as a community can continue to include parents.
4. Coordinate parent engagement programs and activities with other federal, state, and local government programs that encourage and support parents to participate in their children's education.
ACCESSIBILITY
To the extent possible, Copper Canyon Elementary School will ensure that information for parents and family members (including parents and family members who have limited English proficiency, parents and family members with disabilities, and parents and family members of migrant children) is in a language they can understand. This includes standards reports and essential school information.
This document was co-developed by a team of parents, teachers, and administrators on dates between August 2026 and October 2026.
School-Family Compact
|
|
STUDENT I Will: |
PARENT I Will: |
TEACHER: I Will |
SCHOOL I Will |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Preparation |
Arrive at school on time and ready to learn |
Ensure my child attends school regularly and on time |
Provide high-quality, engaging curriculum and instruction in a supportive and effective learning environment by differentiating instruction and providing frequent feedback |
|
|
Engagement |
Actively listen, actively participate, and ask for help when I need it |
Attend scheduled conferences, contact school with questions or concerns |
Provide data, materials, and/or instructions to empower family engagement |
Regular, two-way communication including at least 2 Parent-Teacher Conferences on the following dates: Sept 16&17 Feb. 10&11 |
|
Build Community |
Obey classroom rules (CHAMPS) and school expectations (HOWLS) |
Volunteer when possible. Participate in PTA and/or other committees when possible |
Engage in two-way, meaningful communication via scheduled conferences, email, phone calls, ParentSquare |
Provide opportunities for parents to volunteer, observe, and participate in decision-making by sending out opportunities in the school newsletter |
|
Reading |
Read for 20 minutes at least five nights per week using one or more techniques from the teacher |
Read with my child and/or ask questions related to reading |
Utilize evidence-based practices to support individualized student needs |
Support the use of evidence-based practices |
|
Homework |
Ask for help from my teacher and family if I am having trouble doing my work |
Establish a distraction-free place and time for assisting my child with homework |
Provide timely and meaningful feedback on assignments and assessments |
Report Cards available on the following dates: Oct. 15, Dec.18, March 15, May 26 |
This document was co-developed by a team of parents, teachers, and administrators on dates between August 2026 and October 2026.
School Improvement Plan
School Improvement System
Part 1: District Mission & Goals
Our mission is to ensure that students have the knowledge, skills, and dispositions to achieve their potential.
Moon Goals 2033
Moon Goal Deadline is Quickly Approaching! (7 Years)
- Moon Goal 1: K–3 Literacy proficiency rate of 75% or higher
- Moon Goal 2: K–3 Math proficiency rate of 75% or higher
- Moon Goal 3: Graduation rate of 90% or higher
- Moon Goal 4: No schools with student groups in turnaround status
Part 2: Data Check & Needs Assessment
Complete the following tables before the June 10th Guiding Coalition day. Be prepared to share this data with your Guiding Coalition.
Education Partners Present
Kaycee Roberts - Principal
Erin Wirthlin - Admin Intern
Shayle Fivas - Kindergarten Teacher/TEA Representative/Parent
Becky Moorman - 1st Grade Teacher/Parent
Crystalee Draper - 2nd GradeTeacher
Emily Hawkins - 3rd Grade Teacher
Samantha Liptac - 4th Grade Teacher
Lisa Yarborough - 5th Grade Teacher
Rita Tipton - 6th Grade Teacher
Ashley Shields - Literacy Coach / Parent
Academic Achievement and Growth:
2025-2026 Academic Achievement (RISE or UA+)
|
ELA |
Math |
Science |
|
|
% Below Proficient |
47% (124) |
70% (181) |
41% (81) |
|
% Approaching Proficient |
27% (72) |
12% (30) |
24% (48) |
|
% Proficient |
16% (43) |
12% (30) |
23% (46) |
|
% Highly Proficient |
9% (25) |
7% (19) |
11% (22) |
2025-2026 K-3 Acadience Reading and Math (Elementary Only)
|
EOY Reading Composite |
EOY Math Composite |
EOY Reading Pathway of Progress |
EOY Math Pathway of Progress |
||
|
Above Benmark |
45% (113) |
33% |
Well Above Typical |
27% (68) |
37% |
|
At Benchmark |
20% (49) |
13% |
Above Typical |
17% (43) |
22% |
|
Below Benchmark |
12% (30) |
25% |
Typical |
24% (59) |
20% |
|
Well Below Benchmark |
23% (58) |
30% |
Below/Well Below Typical |
32% (79) |
21% |
2024-2025 Academic Achievement & Growth (RISE or UA+)
|
ELA |
Math |
Science |
|
|
% Below Proficient |
43% |
65% |
42% |
|
% Approaching Proficient |
29% |
14% |
27% |
|
% Proficient |
18% |
12% |
17% |
|
% Highly Proficient |
10% |
9% |
15% |
|
Hispanic % Proficient |
|||
|
School Year |
ELA |
Math |
Science |
|
2022-23 |
14% |
18% |
21% |
|
2023-24 |
19% |
14.3% |
23% |
|
2024-25 |
19% |
13% |
12% |
|
Hispanic Growth |
|||
|
School Year |
ELA |
Math |
Science |
|
2022-23 |
76% |
68% |
74% |
|
2023-24 |
53% |
45% |
36% |
|
2024-25 |
52% |
38% |
32% |
|
MGP (Data Gateway) |
||
|
ELA |
Math |
Science |
|
49.8% Average |
43.0% Low |
42.0% Low |
2024-2025 K-3 Acadience Reading and Math (Elementary Only)
|
EOY Reading Composite |
EOY Math Composite |
EOY Reading Pathway of Progress |
EOY Math Pathway of Progress |
||
|
Above Benmark |
44% |
33% |
Well Above Typical |
25% |
23% |
|
At Benchmark |
23% |
16% |
Above Typical |
20% |
23% |
|
Below Benchmark |
8% |
22% |
Typical |
26% |
18% |
|
Well Below Benchmark |
25% |
30% |
Below/Well Below Typical |
28% |
35% |
Educator’s Handbook Data:
Total number of Office Referrals:
Number of Office Referrals each month:
|
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
|
7 |
36 |
20 |
13 |
13 |
31 |
21 |
40 |
41 |
12 |
- Top 3 locations:
- Busiest 3 hours:
- Top 3 Offenses
- Lost days (instructional time) due to out-of-school suspension and in-school suspension:
Total number of Minor Incidents:
Number of Minor Incidents each Month:
|
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
|
35 |
157 |
114 |
76 |
78 |
74 |
83 |
60 |
68 |
45 |
- Top 3 locations:
- Busiest 3 hours:
- Top 3 Offenses
Schools with groups in TSI, ATSI, CSI, or Springboard:
Under “Student Demographics,” investigate your subgroups of interest.
|
Subgroup |
Risk ratio |
Number of Incidents |
Number of Students |
Cost (Days) |
|
Hispanic |
.91 |
65 |
29 |
27.22 |
To systematically identify key areas for school improvement, the Guiding Coalition team triangulated multiple data streams, analyzing Acadience Reading and literacy scores, Educator’s Handbook behavior reports, student demographic profiles, and attendance records. Through this comprehensive evaluation, three critical priority areas emerged: math scores, office referrals, and literacy scores among the Hispanic student population. Following extensive collaborative discussion and applying the 5 Whys methodology for root cause analysis, the team uncovered the underlying factors driving these trends rather than merely addressing surface-level symptoms:
- Hispanic students are not doing well on the RISE
- Hispanic students are not doing well in classes and not understanding English well enough to understand content
- ML aide will help support Hispanic students learn better in classes by front-loading vocabulary leading to better test results
- Hispanic students not exiting WIDA very quickly,
- Not taking the test very seriously
- No incentive, students do not feel like it’s important
- Need to gain parent involvement
- Teachers reaching out and heavily messaging the importance of RISE and WIDA tests
- Math low for all subgroups →it’s a Tier 1 issue, therefore the academic improvement goal needs to be a school-wide goal
- Behavior consequences were inconsistent school-wide leading to increased classroom disruptions
- Hispanic students have been behaving well compared to the rest of the population, but the disruptions were impacting the quality of their education and learning
- Improved consistency will decrease disruptions and lead to better educational outcomes for all subgroups.
This process enabled the team to establish realistic, data-informed goals alongside targeted action steps specifically designed to address each priority area and elevate overall student outcomes.
We anticipate that through our dual-focused strategy—targeting overall mathematics proficiency alongside targeted literacy interventions designed to enhance WIDA performance—our Hispanic student demographic will demonstrate substantial academic growth, ultimately positioning the school to exit ATSI designation.
Under the direction of the principal, the team also carefully evaluated all school budgets and current staffing allocations to guarantee that financial and human resources are strategically aligned with our school improvement goals. To directly support our priority areas, the team determined that investing in targeted professional development through Solution Tree, adding a Multilingual Learner (ML) paraeducator, funding a full-time counselor, and hiring two academic aides for targeted interventions will provide the precise structural support needed to achieve our desired outcomes. Additionally, the team conducted a thorough review for resource inequities across programs and grade levels and determined that none were present, ensuring that support is distributed equitably to maximize success for all students.
Annual SMART Goals: Student Outcomes at the end of 2026-2027
**If you have a group in a turnaround status, your academic goal needs to address improvement for that subgroup.
|
School Academic Improvement Goal: By May 2027, students will increase their math proficiency score by 20% through the Acadience Math composite in grades K-3 or RISE Math interim in grades 4-6th BOY to EOY |
|
School Behavior Improvement Goal: By May 2027, CCE will reduce the number of office referrals by 15% |
|
School Specific Goal (Optional): Our Hispanic population will increase their RISE Language Arts proficiency from 16% in 2024-2025 to 21% on RISE Language Arts 2025-2026 |
Part 3: School Vision (prior to June 10th):
Most Principals overestimate what they can do in one year, but underestimate what they can do in three.
|
Think three years into the future. It’s the end of the 2028-2029 school year. What do you want to have accomplished?
|
|
Principal Response: Embedded Systems: GVCs, Instructional Framework, CFAs, Intervention and Enrichments, CHAMPS, MTSS, STAT Student Achievement proficiency increase by 20% across all content areas Values: Kindness and Empathy, Respect, Resilience, Responsibility and Accountability, Collaboration and Cooperation |
Part 4: 2026-2027 School Year School Improvement Plan
School Improvement Plan (SIP) & Action Items
Campus Priority 1: Academic Improvement
Academic AHLP Implementation Plan
|
Month |
August Principals Day |
September PL Day Sep. 22nd |
October Teacher Work Day Oct. 19 |
November PL Day Nov. 10 |
December Teacher Work Day Dec. 18 |
|
Type of principal guided time/day |
Intro to post unit and DAO progression |
PLT day- Review of DAO progression, essential information and build or use reviewed unit assessments aligned to essential DAOs and CFAs. |
Analyze outcomes of administered post-unit assessment to determine intervention and enrichments to be provided. |
Reviewing outcomes and implementation of interventions/enrichments. Plan for 2nd post-unit assessment.
Build or use reviewed unit assessments aligned to essential DAOs and CFAs. |
Discuss the why and what is expected to move forward.
Plan for future post-unit assessments.
|
|
Amount of time available to use |
20 minutes |
Teacher time- 2 hours |
Teacher time- 2 hours |
Teacher time- 2 hours |
Teacher time- 1 hour |
|
Other type of principal guided time/day |
7 Hours |
Faculty Meeting/ quick review |
Faculty Meeting/ quick review |
Faculty Meeting quick review |
Faculty Meeting - review of progress and introduction of PLC reset |
|
Amount of time available to use |
20 Minutes |
10 minutes |
15 minutes |
10 minutes |
30 Minutes |
|
Step(s) of guide or content focus |
Introduction |
DOA progression |
Focus on data outcomes |
Expected steps and the “why” |
Final check of post unit intervention implementation |
|
Teacher Products |
|
DAO progression |
Schedule Intervention/ enrichment time |
Plan for post unit intervention and enrichment |
Proof of post unit intervention and enrichment implementation |
|
What went well in past implementations that would be helpful to do again? |
Keep it simple and informative |
Staff share success and concerns |
teams share outcomes of the process |
|
|
|
Resources to use |
Unit Assessment Development- checklist and DAO- question Alignment Matrix
|
Unit Assessment Development- checklist and DAO- question Alignment Matrix |
Unit Assessment Development- checklist and DAO- question Alignment Matrix |
Unit Assessment Development- checklist and DAO- question Alignment Matrix
|
Unit Assessment Development- checklist and DAO- question Alignment Matrix
|
|
Month |
January PL Day Jan.12 |
February PL Day Feb. 12 |
March Teacher Work Day Mar.15 PL Day Mar. 23 |
|
Type of principal guided time/day |
Introduction and expectation to PLC reset- NORMS and Schoolwide Agenda |
Check in that norms have been established and the schoolwide agenda is working for all teams. Review 5 essential questions and expectation for devoted PLC time |
Check in on use of district vocabulary, norms, and use of data in PLC teams |
|
Amount of time available to use |
2 hours |
4 hours |
2 hours |
|
Step(s) of guide or content focus |
|
|
|
|
Teacher Products |
Norms for their team PLCs and a plan to hold each other accountable for those norms Collaborate on a school wide PLS agenda that will work across all grade levels |
Previous PLC agendas to review the effectiveness of meeting |
Data, previous PLC agendas to review effectiveness of meeting |
|
Month |
January PL Day Jan.12 |
February PL Day Feb. 12 |
March Teacher Work Day Mar.15 PL Day Mar. 23 |
|
Type of principal guided time/day |
Introduction and expectation to PLC reset- NORMS and Schoolwide Agenda |
Check in that norms have been established and the schoolwide agenda is working for all teams. Review 5 essential questions and expectation for devoted PLC time |
Check in on use of district vocabulary, norms, and use of data in PLC teams |
|
Amount of time available to use |
2 hours |
4 hours |
2 hours |
|
Step(s) of guide or content focus |
|
|
|
|
Teacher Products |
Norms for their team PLCs and a plan to hold each other accountable for those norms Collaborate on a school wide PLS agenda that will work across all grade levels |
Previous PLC agendas to review the effectiveness of meeting |
Data, previous PLC agendas to review effectiveness of meeting |
|
What went well in past implementations that would be helpful to do again? |
Teams are willing to work together, they communicate and collaborate well |
Teams are willing to work together, they communicate and collaborate well |
Teams are willing to work together, they communicate and collaborate well. Teams work with the literacy coach to review data and make data driven decisions |
|
Resources to use |
Books to help guide discussions surrounding establishing Norms: Learning by Doing Concise answers to Frequently Asked Questions |
Books to help guide discussions surrounding the 5 essential questions and expectations for devoted PLC time: Learning by Doing Concise answers to Frequently Asked Questions
|
Acadiance Data in both math and literacy RISE benchmark data in Math, Literacy and Science |
School Academic Improvement Goal (from end of Part 2)
|
**If you have a group in a turnaround status, your goal needs to address improvement for that subgroup. Objective: Increase students' understanding of grade-level math concepts and applications to eventually reach moon goal levels of proficiency in math Prioritized Key Components: Academics - Math TCSD Strategic Model Area(s) and AHLP: Strategic Model # 2: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Metrics: Acadience Math and RISE interim |
||||
|
Rewrite the academic student outcome goal:By May 2027, students will increase their math proficiency score by 20% through the Acadience Math composite in grades K-3 or RISE Math interim in grades 4-6th BOY to EOY. |
||||
|
Specific Actions
|
Person Responsible |
Resources |
Timeline for Implementation |
Evidence of Successful Completion (what a successful outcome looks like… “how you will know” you’ve accomplished this component). |
|
Baseline of all assessments completed |
Classroom teachers |
Acadience/RISE |
Completed by Sept. 2 |
All students have completed the baseline assessment |
|
Data analysis of results |
Classroom teachers and admin |
Acadience/RISE |
Complete by Sept. 8 |
Excel sheet to track the progress of below/well below students. |
|
Math intervention for targeted students |
Math aides |
Math Intervention program - Into Math and Delta Math |
Begin supporting students by Sept. 9 |
Increased scores on math assessments |
|
Implementation of math CFAs and CFA cycles |
Classroom teachers with the Principal and Admin Intern checking in on progress |
The CFA created by the teachers last year, dedicated PLC time to review data, spreadsheet to record and monitor progress of the students |
Continued progress monitoring throughout the school year to target specific skills students are struggling with |
Students will demonstrate growth on the assessments due to data driven decision making |
|
Professional Development on essential standards |
Principal |
Solution Tree training provided by Marie Nelson |
Three-hour virtual training in October and again in January |
Teachers will be able to use information to improve GVCs and core instruction in the classroom. This training will help align our practices with the TCSD core instruction practices |
|
Professional Development on Into Math |
Sam Liptac - will lead the training |
Into Math program - access to the professional development provided within the program. Time during faculty meeting for the training Time during planning to explore the website and understand the resources |
First PD will be completed by October 14 Second PD will be completed by December 16 Third PD will be completed by March 11 Fourth PD will be completed by May 21 |
Provide teachers with dedicated time to look at professional development on Into Math - Teachers corner. (Once per quarter during faculty meeting time) Hold teacher accountable - having them try it in groups, them come back and report |
Campus Priority 2: Behavior Improvement -
Behavior AHLP Implementation Plan
|
Month |
August Principals Day |
September PL Day Sep. 22nd |
October Teacher Work Day Oct. 19 |
November PL Day Nov. 10 |
December Teacher Work Day Dec. 18 |
|
Type of principal guided time/day |
Professional learning / expectation Setting |
Professional learning day |
Guided Work Time |
Professional Learning Day |
Guided Mid-year review |
|
Amount of time available to use |
6 hours |
6 hours |
3 hours |
|
|
|
Other type of principal guided time/day |
Faculty Meeting / Quick Review |
Faculty Meeting/ quick review |
Faculty Meeting/ quick review |
Faculty Meeting quick review |
|
|
Amount of time available to use |
30 Minutes |
30 Minutes |
30 minutes |
30 Minutes |
30 Minutes |
|
Step(s) of guide or content focus |
Establishing Routines & Behavior Expectations
Define tier-1 behavioral matrix and explicit office discipline referral (ODR) criteria vs. classroom-managed behavior
|
De-escalation & Classroom Management
De-escalation techniques, identifying referral triggers, and early interventions.
|
Data Check & Target Interventions
Review September referral data. Identify time-of-day/location hotspots and high-need students for Tier 2 support.
|
Restorative Practices & Communication
Restorative conversations, active listening, and family engagement before submitting referrals.
|
Mid-Year Check & Self-Care
Evaluate referral trend vs. 15% reduction goal; share successful classroom strategies across teams.
|
|
Teacher Products |
School-wide behavior matrix & classroom rule poster draft. |
3 non-verbal de-escalation strategies written into lesson plans. |
Student behavior support plans (Tier 2) for top 5% at-risk students. |
Restorative reflection form & parent contact log. |
Mid-year referral goal audit & adjusted classroom management goals. |
|
What went well in past implementations that would be helpful to do again? |
Clear visual behavior charts and consistent school-wide voice/rules from Day 1. |
Behavior academies and body basics training for student |
Looking at real referral data in grade-level teams to spot trends early. |
Student self reflection instead of immediate punitive referrals |
"Teacher spotlight" segment sharing quick behavior hacks that worked. |
|
Resources to use |
CHAMPS |
Fostering Resilient Learners excerpt, Behavior de-escalation cheat sheet. |
Educator’s handbook |
|
Mid-year discipline report |
|
Month |
January PL Day Jan.12 |
February PL Day Feb. 12 |
March Teacher Work Day Mar.15 PL Day Mar. 23 |
|
Type of principal guided time/day |
Professional Learning Day |
Professional Learning Day |
Professional Learning and Planning Day |
|
Other type of principal guided time/day |
Faculty Meeting / Quick Review |
Faculty Meeting/ quick review |
Faculty Meeting/ quick review |
|
Amount of time available to use |
30 minutes |
30 Minutes |
30 Minutes |
|
Step(s) of guide or content focus |
Resetting Expectations Post-Break
Reteaching expectations, addressing mid-year fatigue, and boosting positive reinforcement.
|
Trauma-Informed & Relationship Building
Building connections with high-referral students; proactive relationship strategies.
|
Spring Fever Prevention & Data Audit
Refining outdoor/unstructured time management (recess, hallway, lunch) to prevent spring referral spikes.
|
|
Teacher Products |
Classroom behavior refresh plan & positive incentive system. |
"2x10" Strategy Log (2 minutes a day for 10 days with a focal student). |
Unstructured time supervision plan & final 15% goal review checklist. |
|
What went well in past implementations that would be helpful to do again? |
Reteaching routines explicitly during the first 3 days back from winter break. |
Focus on building personal connections to reduce defiance and power struggles. |
Proactive active supervision training for non-classroom transition times. |
|
Resources to use |
Positive behavior tracking app/sheets, Expectation refresh slides. |
Trauma-informed teaching toolkit, 2x10 connection tracker. |
Spring referral trend reports |
|
School Behavior Improvement Goal |
||||
|
Objective: Reduce the number of office through professional learning, consistency, and clarity around school rules/expectations Prioritized Key Components: By May 2027, CCE will reduce the number of office referrals by 15%. TCSD Strategic Model Area(s) and AHLP: Strategic Model Area 4: Safe and Orderly Environment Metrics:Educators Handbook
|
||||
|
Specific Actions
|
Person Responsible |
Resources |
Timeline for Implementation |
Evidence of Successful Completion (what a successful outcome looks like… “how you will know” you’ve accomplished this component). |
|
Body Basic Lessons |
Refocus, Behavior Aide, Admin. |
Tough Kids Handbooks |
Present all lessons to each class by the end of 1st term. |
Students display behaviors reflected in the lessons provided. |
|
Rethink Ed. Provide PD for teachers to understand the resources available through this program |
Counselor/ Teachers |
Rethink ED online |
Mid -September |
Teachers and staff will attend PD and implement what is learned. |
|
Lunch Bunch skills groups |
Counselor |
Counselor resources |
October 1 |
Lunch bunch groups met and progressed through lessons based on target skill |
|
Behavior Academy |
Counselor and Refocus Mentors |
Solution Tree Books, training attended by staff members |
Mid-September |
Student will learn targeted skills and replacement strategies for problem behaviors |
|
PBIS Program Implementation (Cool Coyote Cards and tickets) |
Teachers, PBIS |
Tickets, prizes, time, organization |
Principal’s Day |
PBIS team will meet to determine a more efficient way to implement cool coyote and ticket system |
|
Staff training on school wide expectations |
Administration |
Time, HOWLS, poster |
Principal’s Day |
During principal’s day take a tour of the building giving training on explicit training on expectations for common areas |
|
Schoolwide/classroom rules and expectations are clearly defined and explicitly taught |
Teachers, administration, all staff members |
School expectations, HOWLS |
First 2 weeks of school and reviewed weekly throughout the year |
Students and staff support and follow rules throughout the school. |
Campus Priority 3: School Specific (optional) -
Objective: Enhance educational outcomes and advance proficiency for our Hispanic student population through high-leverage learning strategies, with the ultimate goal of achieving ATSI exit criteria.
Prioritized Key Components: TCSD Strategic Model Area(s) and AHLP: Strategic Model # 2: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
Metrics: WIDA and RISE testing data
|
School Specific Goal: Our Hispanic population will increase their RISE Language Arts proficiency from 16% in 2024-2025 to 21% on RISE Language Arts 2025-2026
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Specific Actions
|
Person Responsible |
Resources |
Timeline for Implementation |
Evidence of Successful Completion (what a successful outcome looks like… “how you will know” you’ve accomplished this component). |
|
Front-load vocabulary words for better understanding of content in Language Arts |
Classroom Teacher/ ML specialist |
Wonders Vocabulary list per unit |
Continuing all school year |
Increase Students' proficiency of academic vocabulary in context |
|
Professional development for teachers to improve tier one instruction |
Kaycee Roberts, Principal |
Solution Tree training provided by Marie Nelson |
Three-hour virtual training in October and again in January |
Teachers will be able to use information to improve GVCs and core instruction in the classroom. This training will help align our practices with the TCSD core instruction practices |
|
Baseline of all assessments completed |
Classroom teachers |
Acadience/RISE |
Completed by Sept. 2 |
All students have completed the baseline assessment |
|
Identify Hispanic students in need of intervention |
Classroom teachers |
Acadience and demographic data |
Completed by September 20th |
We will have a list of hispanic students in need of intervention |
|
Targeted Intervention Groups |
ML para, Literacy Coaches, classroom teachers |
Acadience data, RISE Benchmark data |
On-going throughout the school year - continued progress monitoring in the intervention group |
Identified Hispanic students will have targeted research based interventions and progress monitoring. |
|
Campaign to increase participation and buy in for WIDA testing |
Erin Wirthlin |
MEL specialist, MEL para, Parent Square, Flyers |
Beginning in December 1 and continuing until January 15th |
Students and parents will understand the importance of WIDA testing and take the test seriously |
|
Middle of the year assessment completed - continued progress monitoring |
Classroom Teachers |
Acadience/ RISE Benchmarks |
Completed by January 29th |
All students will have completed the middle of the year assessments. Data analysis will be completed and list of students in need of intervention will be updated |
Part 5: Planning Quarterly Check-Ins
- Potential Format:
- NS: not started
- B: Beginning
- OT: On Track
- C: Completed
Quarter 1 |
|||||||
|
Action Item |
Timeline for Implementation |
Implementation Progress Rating |
Evidence of Successful Completion |
Notes |
|||
|
NS |
B |
OT |
C |
||||
|
Goal 1: Academic AHLP & Academic Goal |
|||||||
|
Baseline of all assessments completed |
By Sept. 2 |
All students have completed a baseline assessment |
|||||
|
Data analysis of results |
By Sept. 8 |
Excel sheet to track progress of below/well below students |
|||||
|
Math intervention for targeted students |
By Sept. 9 |
Increased scores on math assessments |
|||||
|
Implementation of math CFAs and CFA cycles |
Continued progress monitoring throughout the school year |
Identify and address students’ skill gaps in math |
|||||
|
Professional Development on essential standards |
3-hour virtual training in October, and again in January |
Teacher will be able to identify essential Math and Literacy standards |
|||||
|
Professional Development on Into Math |
First PD by October 14 |
Provide teachers with dedicated time to look at professional development on Into Math - Teachers corner. (Once per quarter during faculty meeting time) Hold teacher accountable - having them try it in groups, them come back and report |
|||||
|
Goal 2: Behavior AHLP & Behavior Goal |
|||||||
|
Body Basic Lessons |
Present all lessons to each class by the end of 1st term. |
Students display behaviors reflected in the lessons provided |
|||||
|
Rethink Ed. Provide PD for teachers to understand the resources available through this program |
Mid -September |
Teachers and staff will attend PD and implement what is learned. |
|||||
|
Lunch Bunch skills groups |
October 1 |
Lunch bunch groups met and progressed through lessons based on target skill |
|||||
|
Behavior Academy |
Mid-September |
Students will learn targeted skills and replacement strategies for problem behaviors. |
|||||
|
PBIS Program Implementation (Cool Coyote Cards and tickets) |
Principal’s Day |
PBIS team will meet to determine a more efficient way to implement cool coyote and ticket system |
|||||
|
Staff training on school wide expectations |
Principal’s Day |
During principal’s day take a tour of the building giving training on explicit training on expectations for common areas |
|||||
|
Schoolwide/classroom rules and expectations are clearly defined and explicitly taught |
First 2 weeks of school and reviewed weekly throughout the year |
Students and staff support and follow rules throughout the school. |
|||||
|
Goal 3: Optional Goal |
|||||||
|
Front-load vocabulary words for better understanding of content in Language Arts |
Continuing all school year |
Increase Students' proficiency of academic vocabulary in context |
|||||
|
Professional development for teachers to improve tier one instruction |
Three-hour virtual training in October and again in January |
Teachers will be able to use information to improve GVCs and core instruction in the classroom |
|||||
|
Baseline of all assessments completed |
Completed by Sept. 2 |
All students have completed the baseline assessment |
|||||
|
Identify Hispanic students in need of intervention |
Completed by September 20th |
We will have list of students who need additional help beyond tier 1 instruction |
|||||
|
Targeted Intervention Groups |
On-going throughout the school year - continued progress monitoring in the intervention group |
Identified Hispanic students will have targeted research based interventions and progress monitoring. |
|||||
|
Campaign to increase participation and buy in for WIDA testing |
Beginning in December 1 and continuing until January 15th |
Students and parents will understand the importance of WIDA testing and take the test seriously |
|||||
|
Middle of the year assessment completed - continued progress monitoring |
Completed by January 29th |
All students will have completed the middle of the year assessments. Data analysis will be completed and list of students in need of intervention will be updated |
|||||
Part 6: Homework aka Summer Admin Work: Resource Allocation & Alignment
Time: Professional Learning Plan (due August Leadership?)
Intentionally align PL to semester plan goals
Intentionally plan when to share data and what data to share
Intentionally plan when to share the semester plan
Intentionally plan when to share progress on the semester plan
First Term |
||||
|
Date: |
Meeting: |
Time Frame: |
Goal: |
Topics & Data: |
|
8/2026 |
Principal’s Meeting |
6 hours |
All Three |
All three goals will be introduced to the whole faculty Data from the |
|
08/2026 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Academic / Targeted |
Completion of Baseline testing |
|
09/2026 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Behavior / Academic |
Check in on documentation and procedures - are things working Review of baseline data |
|
09/2026 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Targeted |
Lists of students identified for intervention |
|
09/22/26 |
Early Release PL |
3 hours |
AHLPS |
Post unit intervention and enrichment |
|
10/2026 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Behavior / Academic |
Review referral data from educator’s handbook Into Math PD |
|
10/19/26 |
End of term TWD |
1 hour |
Academic |
Review Acadiance and benchmark data to course correct as needed |
Second Term |
||||
|
Date: |
Meeting: |
Time Frame: |
Goal: |
Topics: |
|
10/2026 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Behavior |
Office Referral Data |
|
11/2026 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Target |
Intervention group data |
|
11/10/26 |
Early Release PL |
3 hours |
AHLPS |
Post Unit Intervention and Enrichment |
|
11/26 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Targeted |
Data on our Hispanic population and how the interventions are working |
|
12/2026 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Academic |
Into Math PD |
|
12/18/26 |
End of term TWD |
1 hour |
All Three |
Data review - are we making adequate progress |
Third Term |
||||
|
Date: |
Meeting: |
Time Frame: |
Goal: |
Topics: |
|
01/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Academic |
Middle of the year testing |
|
01/12/27 |
Early Release PL |
3 hours |
ALHPs |
PLC Reset - Norms and agenda |
|
01/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Targeted |
MOY data to determine if intervention groups need to be change |
|
02/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Behavior |
Office referral data to review and see if there are any system changes to be made Review of PBIS systems put in place |
|
02/12/27 |
District/PL Day |
? |
||
|
02/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Academic |
Data on implementation of professional development received from solution tree |
|
03/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Targeted |
Data on intervention groups and WIDA testing |
|
03/15/27 |
End of term TWD |
1 hour |
All three |
Data review - are we making adequate progress |
Fourth Term |
||||
|
Date: |
Meeting: |
Time Frame: |
Goal: |
Topics: |
|
03/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Behavior |
Data on how the PBIS implementation is going |
|
03/23/27 |
Early Release PL |
3 hours |
ALHPS |
PLC Reset - Selecting tasks for devoted PLC time and the 5 essential questions |
|
04/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Academic |
Data on preparation for end of year RISE testing, what can we do to ensure students are prepared |
|
04/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Targeted |
Testing Data on our targeted intervention groups - did the interventions help the students with growth |
|
05/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Behavior |
Office referral data from this school year and last school year - was there a reduction |
|
05/2027 |
Faculty Meeting |
30 minutes |
Academic |
EOY testing data |
|
05/26/27 |
End of term TWD |
1 hour |
All three |
Did we make progress? What worked? What didn’t? How can we do better next year |
